cracking: be more useful than large molecules

Related concepts

Parents	problem Weight: 0.60 , process Weight: 0.53 , cause Weight: 0.51 , reaction Weight: 0.50 , characteristic Weight: 0.49
Siblings	crack Weight: 0.35 , tear Weight: 0.32 , rubbing Weight: 0.32 , breaking Weight: 0.31 , mental health problem Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property	Similarity
be more useful than large molecules	1.00
be more useful than molecules	0.98
be more useful than original large molecules	0.97
be more useful than original molecules	0.94
be useful	0.78
is useful	0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.33

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.36

Plausible(cause, be useful) ⋁

Evidence: 0.58

¬ Typical(cracking, be more useful than large molecules)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.54

Plausible(cracking, be more useful than large molecules) ⋁

Evidence: 0.36

¬ Plausible(cause, be useful)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.22

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.59

¬ Remarkable(cracking, be more useful than large molecules) ⋁

Evidence: 0.86

¬ Remarkable(cause, be useful)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.28

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.36

Plausible(cause, be useful) ⋁

Evidence: 0.59

Remarkable(cracking, be more useful than large molecules) ⋁

Evidence: 0.54

¬ Plausible(cracking, be more useful than large molecules)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.54

Plausible(cracking, be more useful than large molecules) ⋁

Evidence: 0.60

¬ Salient(cracking, be more useful than large molecules)

Similarity expansion

0.75

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.98

Evidence: 0.58

Typical(cracking, be more useful than large molecules) ⋁

Evidence: 0.24

¬ Typical(cracking, be more useful than molecules)

0.70

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.98

Evidence: 0.54

Plausible(cracking, be more useful than large molecules) ⋁

Evidence: 0.36

¬ Plausible(cracking, be more useful than molecules)

0.67

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.98

Evidence: 0.60

Salient(cracking, be more useful than large molecules) ⋁

Evidence: 0.50

¬ Salient(cracking, be more useful than molecules)

0.66

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.97

Evidence: 0.59

Remarkable(cracking, be more useful than large molecules) ⋁

Evidence: 0.48

¬ Remarkable(cracking, be more useful than original large molecules)

0.63

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.94

Evidence: 0.59

Remarkable(cracking, be more useful than large molecules) ⋁

Evidence: 0.52

¬ Remarkable(cracking, be more useful than original molecules)

0.56

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.98

Evidence: 0.59

Remarkable(cracking, be more useful than large molecules) ⋁

Evidence: 0.81

¬ Remarkable(cracking, be more useful than molecules)

0.56

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.58

Typical(cracking, be more useful than large molecules) ⋁

Evidence: 0.38

¬ Typical(cracking, is useful)

0.53

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.97

Evidence: 0.60

Salient(cracking, be more useful than large molecules) ⋁

Evidence: 0.87

¬ Salient(cracking, be more useful than original large molecules)

0.51

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.58

Typical(cracking, be more useful than large molecules) ⋁

Evidence: 0.54

¬ Typical(cracking, be useful)

0.51

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.94

Evidence: 0.60

Salient(cracking, be more useful than large molecules) ⋁

Evidence: 0.90

¬ Salient(cracking, be more useful than original molecules)

0.50

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.54

Plausible(cracking, be more useful than large molecules) ⋁

Evidence: 0.52

¬ Plausible(cracking, is useful)

0.50

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.97

Evidence: 0.54

Plausible(cracking, be more useful than large molecules) ⋁

Evidence: 0.84

¬ Plausible(cracking, be more useful than original large molecules)

0.50

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.97

Evidence: 0.58

Typical(cracking, be more useful than large molecules) ⋁

Evidence: 0.92

¬ Typical(cracking, be more useful than original large molecules)

0.49

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.94

Evidence: 0.58

Typical(cracking, be more useful than large molecules) ⋁

Evidence: 0.93

¬ Typical(cracking, be more useful than original molecules)

0.48

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.94

Evidence: 0.54

Plausible(cracking, be more useful than large molecules) ⋁

Evidence: 0.86

¬ Plausible(cracking, be more useful than original molecules)

0.47

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.54

Plausible(cracking, be more useful than large molecules) ⋁

Evidence: 0.62

¬ Plausible(cracking, be useful)

0.46

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.60

Salient(cracking, be more useful than large molecules) ⋁

Evidence: 0.75

¬ Salient(cracking, is useful)

0.45

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.60

Salient(cracking, be more useful than large molecules) ⋁

Evidence: 0.81

¬ Salient(cracking, be useful)

0.44

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.59

Remarkable(cracking, be more useful than large molecules) ⋁

Evidence: 0.84

¬ Remarkable(cracking, be useful)

0.42

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.59

Remarkable(cracking, be more useful than large molecules) ⋁

Evidence: 0.89

¬ Remarkable(cracking, is useful)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.60

Salient(cracking, be more useful than large molecules) ⋁

Evidence: 0.58

¬ Typical(cracking, be more useful than large molecules) ⋁

Evidence: 0.59

¬ Remarkable(cracking, be more useful than large molecules)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.54

Plausible(cracking, be more useful than large molecules) ⋁

Evidence: 0.58

¬ Typical(cracking, be more useful than large molecules)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.35

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.59

¬ Remarkable(cracking, be more useful than large molecules) ⋁

Evidence: 0.22

¬ Typical(cause, be useful)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.34

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.58

Typical(cracking, be more useful than large molecules) ⋁

Evidence: 0.22

¬ Typical(cause, be useful)