crane fly: has quality bad

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents insect
Weight: 0.57
Siblings fly
Weight: 0.34
, housefly
Weight: 0.33
, spider
Weight: 0.32
, scorpion
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality bad 1.00
be bad year 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(crane fly, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(fly, has quality bad)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(crane fly, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(fly, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(fly, has quality bad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(crane fly, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(crane fly, has quality bad)

Similarity expansion

0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(crane fly, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(crane fly, be bad year)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(crane fly, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Salient(crane fly, be bad year)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(crane fly, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(crane fly, be bad year)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(crane fly, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(crane fly, be bad year)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Salient(crane fly, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(crane fly, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(crane fly, has quality bad)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(crane fly, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(crane fly, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(crane fly, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(fly, has quality bad)