crane: be at risk

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents machine
Weight: 0.65
, bird
Weight: 0.65
, equipment
Weight: 0.59
, vehicle
Weight: 0.58
, structure
Weight: 0.57
Siblings whooping crane
Weight: 0.78
, forklift
Weight: 0.35
, peregrine falcon
Weight: 0.35
, scaffold
Weight: 0.34
, pickup truck
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at risk 1.00
be in danger 0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(crane, be at risk)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(whooping crane, be at risk)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(crane, be at risk)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(whooping crane, be in danger)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(crane, be at risk)
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(whooping crane, be at risk)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(whooping crane, be at risk)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(crane, be at risk)
Evidence: 0.43
Remarkable(whooping crane, be in danger)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(whooping crane, be in danger)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(crane, be at risk)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(crane, be at risk)

Similarity expansion

0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(crane, be at risk)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(crane, be in danger)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(crane, be at risk)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(crane, be in danger)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(crane, be at risk)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(crane, be in danger)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.55
Typical(crane, be at risk)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(crane, be in danger)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(crane, be at risk)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(crane, be at risk)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(crane, be at risk)

Typical implies Plausible

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Plausible(crane, be at risk)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(crane, be at risk)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(crane, be at risk)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(whooping crane, be at risk)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(crane, be at risk)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(whooping crane, be in danger)