crap: is best odds

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents thing
Weight: 0.61
, word
Weight: 0.60
, game
Weight: 0.57
, favorite
Weight: 0.55
Siblings flip flop
Weight: 0.65
, ss
Weight: 0.52
, shit
Weight: 0.37
, hey
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
is best odds 1.00
have best odds 0.99
have odds 0.96
has quality odds 0.95

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(crap, is best odds)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Salient(crap, is best odds)

Similarity expansion

0.81
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.43
Typical(crap, is best odds)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(crap, have odds)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(crap, is best odds)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(crap, have best odds)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.69
Salient(crap, is best odds)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Salient(crap, have odds)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(crap, is best odds)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(crap, has quality odds)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(crap, is best odds)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(crap, have odds)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.69
Salient(crap, is best odds)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Salient(crap, have best odds)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(crap, is best odds)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(crap, have best odds)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.69
Salient(crap, is best odds)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Salient(crap, has quality odds)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.43
Typical(crap, is best odds)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(crap, have best odds)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(crap, is best odds)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(crap, have odds)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.43
Typical(crap, is best odds)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(crap, has quality odds)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(crap, is best odds)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(crap, has quality odds)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Salient(crap, is best odds)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(crap, is best odds)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(crap, is best odds)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(crap, is best odds)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(crap, is best odds)