crater: have central peaks

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents thing
Weight: 0.55
, feature
Weight: 0.54
, object
Weight: 0.51
, place
Weight: 0.50
, lake
Weight: 0.50
Siblings comet
Weight: 0.33
, meteor
Weight: 0.33
, lake champlain
Weight: 0.33
, lake tahoe
Weight: 0.33
, lake erie
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
have central peaks 1.00
have peaks 0.95
have central peak 0.90
have peak 0.83

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(crater, have central peaks)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Salient(crater, have central peaks)

Similarity expansion

0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.05
Remarkable(crater, have central peaks)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(crater, have central peak)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.06
Salient(crater, have central peaks)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Salient(crater, have central peak)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.06
Salient(crater, have central peaks)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Salient(crater, have peaks)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.05
Remarkable(crater, have central peaks)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(crater, have peaks)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.05
Remarkable(crater, have central peaks)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(crater, have peak)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.21
Typical(crater, have central peaks)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(crater, have peaks)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.06
Salient(crater, have central peaks)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Salient(crater, have peak)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.21
Typical(crater, have central peaks)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(crater, have central peak)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(crater, have central peaks)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(crater, have central peak)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(crater, have central peaks)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(crater, have peaks)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.21
Typical(crater, have central peaks)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(crater, have peak)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(crater, have central peaks)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(crater, have peak)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.06
Salient(crater, have central peaks)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(crater, have central peaks)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(crater, have central peaks)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(crater, have central peaks)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(crater, have central peaks)