crater: have peak

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents thing
Weight: 0.55
, feature
Weight: 0.54
, object
Weight: 0.51
, place
Weight: 0.50
, lake
Weight: 0.50
Siblings comet
Weight: 0.33
, meteor
Weight: 0.33
, lake champlain
Weight: 0.33
, lake tahoe
Weight: 0.33
, lake erie
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
have peak 1.00
have central peak 0.93
have peaks 0.86
have central peaks 0.83

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(crater, have peak)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Salient(crater, have peak)

Similarity expansion

0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.07
Remarkable(crater, have peak)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(crater, have central peak)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.09
Salient(crater, have peak)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Salient(crater, have central peak)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.07
Remarkable(crater, have peak)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(crater, have central peaks)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.09
Salient(crater, have peak)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Salient(crater, have central peaks)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.30
Typical(crater, have peak)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(crater, have central peak)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.09
Salient(crater, have peak)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Salient(crater, have peaks)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.07
Remarkable(crater, have peak)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(crater, have peaks)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(crater, have peak)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(crater, have central peak)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.30
Typical(crater, have peak)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(crater, have peaks)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.30
Typical(crater, have peak)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(crater, have central peaks)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(crater, have peak)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(crater, have central peaks)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(crater, have peak)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(crater, have peaks)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.09
Salient(crater, have peak)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(crater, have peak)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(crater, have peak)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(crater, have peak)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(crater, have peak)