creativity: be different for organizations

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents trait
Weight: 0.68
, quality
Weight: 0.67
, characteristic
Weight: 0.66
, discipline
Weight: 0.66
, talent
Weight: 0.64
Siblings passion
Weight: 0.36
, imagination
Weight: 0.36
, enthusiasm
Weight: 0.35
, intellect
Weight: 0.35
, honesty
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be different for organizations 1.00
be important in today 's organizations 0.93
be important to organization 0.81
be necessary in organization 0.79
be different 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.43
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(quality, be important to organization)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(creativity, be different for organizations)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(talent, be important to organization)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(creativity, be different for organizations)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(discipline, be necessary in organization)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(creativity, be different for organizations)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(trait, be different)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(creativity, be different for organizations)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(creativity, be different for organizations)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(trait, be different)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(creativity, be different for organizations)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(discipline, be necessary in organization)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(creativity, be different for organizations)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(talent, be important to organization)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(creativity, be different for organizations)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(quality, be important to organization)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(creativity, be different for organizations)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(quality, be important to organization)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(creativity, be different for organizations)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(talent, be important to organization)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(creativity, be different for organizations)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(trait, be different)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(creativity, be different for organizations)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(discipline, be necessary in organization)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.59
Plausible(quality, be important to organization)
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(creativity, be different for organizations)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(creativity, be different for organizations)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(talent, be important to organization)
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(creativity, be different for organizations)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(creativity, be different for organizations)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(discipline, be necessary in organization)
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(creativity, be different for organizations)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(creativity, be different for organizations)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.39
Plausible(trait, be different)
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(creativity, be different for organizations)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(creativity, be different for organizations)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(creativity, be different for organizations)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Salient(creativity, be different for organizations)

Similarity expansion

0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.51
Typical(creativity, be different for organizations)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(creativity, be important in today 's organizations)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(creativity, be different for organizations)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(creativity, be important in today 's organizations)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.35
Salient(creativity, be different for organizations)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(creativity, be important in today 's organizations)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(creativity, be different for organizations)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(creativity, be important in today 's organizations)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.35
Salient(creativity, be different for organizations)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(creativity, be different for organizations)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(creativity, be different for organizations)

Typical implies Plausible

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(creativity, be different for organizations)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(creativity, be different for organizations)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(creativity, be different for organizations)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(discipline, be necessary in organization)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(creativity, be different for organizations)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(trait, be different)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(creativity, be different for organizations)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(talent, be important to organization)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(creativity, be different for organizations)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(quality, be important to organization)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.51
Typical(creativity, be different for organizations)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(discipline, be necessary in organization)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.51
Typical(creativity, be different for organizations)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(trait, be different)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.51
Typical(creativity, be different for organizations)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(talent, be important to organization)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.51
Typical(creativity, be different for organizations)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(quality, be important to organization)