creditor: be harmed by unexpected inflation

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents financial institution
Weight: 0.67
, debt
Weight: 0.64
, third party
Weight: 0.63
Siblings mortgage lender
Weight: 0.71
, plaintiff
Weight: 0.66
, bank
Weight: 0.65
, employee
Weight: 0.64
, shareholder
Weight: 0.64

Related properties

Property Similarity
be harmed by unexpected inflation 1.00
be harmed by inflation 0.94
be hurt by inflation 0.89

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(creditor, be harmed by unexpected inflation)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(creditor, be harmed by unexpected inflation)

Similarity expansion

0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(creditor, be harmed by unexpected inflation)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(creditor, be harmed by inflation)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(creditor, be harmed by unexpected inflation)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(creditor, be harmed by inflation)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(creditor, be harmed by unexpected inflation)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(creditor, be harmed by inflation)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.92
Typical(creditor, be harmed by unexpected inflation)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(creditor, be hurt by inflation)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(creditor, be harmed by unexpected inflation)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(creditor, be hurt by inflation)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(creditor, be harmed by unexpected inflation)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(creditor, be hurt by inflation)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(creditor, be harmed by unexpected inflation)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(creditor, be harmed by inflation)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.54
Remarkable(creditor, be harmed by unexpected inflation)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(creditor, be hurt by inflation)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Salient(creditor, be harmed by unexpected inflation)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(creditor, be harmed by unexpected inflation)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(creditor, be harmed by unexpected inflation)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(creditor, be harmed by unexpected inflation)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(creditor, be harmed by unexpected inflation)