creditor: is stakeholders

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents financial institution
Weight: 0.67
, debt
Weight: 0.64
, third party
Weight: 0.63
Siblings mortgage lender
Weight: 0.71
, plaintiff
Weight: 0.66
, bank
Weight: 0.65
, employee
Weight: 0.64
, shareholder
Weight: 0.64

Related properties

Property Similarity
is stakeholders 1.00
is important stakeholders 0.98

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.15
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(creditor, is stakeholders)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(shareholder, is important stakeholders)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.05
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(creditor, is stakeholders)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(shareholder, is stakeholders)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.60
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(creditor, is stakeholders)
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(shareholder, is stakeholders)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(shareholder, is stakeholders)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(creditor, is stakeholders)
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(shareholder, is important stakeholders)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(shareholder, is important stakeholders)

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(creditor, is stakeholders)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Salient(creditor, is stakeholders)

Similarity expansion

0.82
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.00
Typical(creditor, is stakeholders)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(creditor, is important stakeholders)
0.82
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(creditor, is stakeholders)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(creditor, is important stakeholders)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(creditor, is stakeholders)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(creditor, is important stakeholders)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.40
Salient(creditor, is stakeholders)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Salient(creditor, is important stakeholders)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
Salient(creditor, is stakeholders)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Typical(creditor, is stakeholders)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(creditor, is stakeholders)

Typical implies Plausible

0.48
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(creditor, is stakeholders)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Typical(creditor, is stakeholders)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(creditor, is stakeholders)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(shareholder, is stakeholders)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(creditor, is stakeholders)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(shareholder, is important stakeholders)