creditor: use accounting

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents financial institution
Weight: 0.67
, debt
Weight: 0.64
, third party
Weight: 0.63
Siblings mortgage lender
Weight: 0.71
, plaintiff
Weight: 0.66
, bank
Weight: 0.65
, employee
Weight: 0.64
, shareholder
Weight: 0.64

Related properties

Property Similarity
use accounting 1.00
use accounting information 0.92
need accounting information 0.90
be interested accounting 0.88

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.22
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(creditor, use accounting)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(shareholder, need accounting information)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.19
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(creditor, use accounting)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(employee, need accounting information)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(creditor, use accounting)
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(employee, need accounting information)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(employee, need accounting information)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(creditor, use accounting)
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(shareholder, need accounting information)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(shareholder, need accounting information)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(creditor, use accounting)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Salient(creditor, use accounting)

Similarity expansion

0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.07
Typical(creditor, use accounting)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(creditor, use accounting information)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.07
Typical(creditor, use accounting)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(creditor, need accounting information)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(creditor, use accounting)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(creditor, use accounting information)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(creditor, use accounting)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(creditor, be interested accounting)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(creditor, use accounting)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(creditor, use accounting information)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.86
Remarkable(creditor, use accounting)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(creditor, need accounting information)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(creditor, use accounting)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(creditor, need accounting information)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.38
Salient(creditor, use accounting)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Salient(creditor, use accounting information)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.07
Typical(creditor, use accounting)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(creditor, be interested accounting)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(creditor, use accounting)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(creditor, be interested accounting)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.38
Salient(creditor, use accounting)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Salient(creditor, be interested accounting)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.38
Salient(creditor, use accounting)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Salient(creditor, need accounting information)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.38
Salient(creditor, use accounting)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(creditor, use accounting)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(creditor, use accounting)

Typical implies Plausible

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(creditor, use accounting)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(creditor, use accounting)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(creditor, use accounting)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(employee, need accounting information)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(creditor, use accounting)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(shareholder, need accounting information)