creditor: use accounting information

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents financial institution
Weight: 0.67
, debt
Weight: 0.64
, third party
Weight: 0.63
Siblings mortgage lender
Weight: 0.71
, plaintiff
Weight: 0.66
, bank
Weight: 0.65
, employee
Weight: 0.64
, shareholder
Weight: 0.64

Related properties

Property Similarity
use accounting information 1.00
need accounting information 0.98
use accounting 0.92
use information 0.86
be interested accounting 0.85
need information 0.83
use financial statements 0.77
use financial statement analysis 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.13
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(creditor, use accounting information)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(shareholder, need accounting information)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.10
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(creditor, use accounting information)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(employee, need accounting information)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.10
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(creditor, use accounting information)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(shareholder, need information)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.08
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(creditor, use accounting information)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(employee, need information)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(creditor, use accounting information)
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(employee, need accounting information)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(employee, need accounting information)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(creditor, use accounting information)
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(shareholder, need accounting information)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(shareholder, need accounting information)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(creditor, use accounting information)
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(employee, need information)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(employee, need information)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(creditor, use accounting information)
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(shareholder, need information)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(shareholder, need information)

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(creditor, use accounting information)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Salient(creditor, use accounting information)

Similarity expansion

0.81
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.02
Typical(creditor, use accounting information)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(creditor, need accounting information)
0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(creditor, use accounting information)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(creditor, need accounting information)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(creditor, use accounting information)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Remarkable(creditor, use accounting)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.02
Typical(creditor, use accounting information)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Typical(creditor, use information)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.02
Typical(creditor, use accounting information)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(creditor, use accounting)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.02
Typical(creditor, use accounting information)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(creditor, need information)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(creditor, use accounting information)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(creditor, be interested accounting)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(creditor, use accounting information)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(creditor, use information)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(creditor, use accounting information)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(creditor, need information)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(creditor, use accounting information)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(creditor, need accounting information)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(creditor, use accounting information)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(creditor, use accounting)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(creditor, use accounting information)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(creditor, use information)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.02
Typical(creditor, use accounting information)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(creditor, use financial statements)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(creditor, use accounting information)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(creditor, use financial statements)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(creditor, use accounting information)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(creditor, use financial statement analysis)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.45
Salient(creditor, use accounting information)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Salient(creditor, use accounting)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(creditor, use accounting information)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(creditor, need information)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.02
Typical(creditor, use accounting information)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(creditor, use financial statement analysis)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.45
Salient(creditor, use accounting information)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Salient(creditor, need accounting information)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(creditor, use accounting information)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(creditor, use financial statements)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(creditor, use accounting information)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(creditor, use financial statement analysis)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.45
Salient(creditor, use accounting information)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Salient(creditor, use information)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.45
Salient(creditor, use accounting information)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Salient(creditor, be interested accounting)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.45
Salient(creditor, use accounting information)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Salient(creditor, use financial statement analysis)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.02
Typical(creditor, use accounting information)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(creditor, be interested accounting)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.45
Salient(creditor, use accounting information)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Salient(creditor, need information)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.45
Salient(creditor, use accounting information)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Salient(creditor, use financial statements)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(creditor, use accounting information)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(creditor, be interested accounting)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
Salient(creditor, use accounting information)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(creditor, use accounting information)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(creditor, use accounting information)

Typical implies Plausible

0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(creditor, use accounting information)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(creditor, use accounting information)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(creditor, use accounting information)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(employee, need accounting information)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(creditor, use accounting information)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(employee, need information)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(creditor, use accounting information)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(shareholder, need accounting information)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(creditor, use accounting information)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Typical(shareholder, need information)