creeper: is endangered

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents mob
Weight: 0.55
, character
Weight: 0.51
, plant
Weight: 0.51
, creature
Weight: 0.49
, concept
Weight: 0.47
Siblings dung beetle
Weight: 0.32
, caterpillar
Weight: 0.32
, tree frog
Weight: 0.32
, lizard
Weight: 0.32
, wasp
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
is endangered 1.00

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(creeper, is endangered) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(tree frog, is endangered)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(creeper, is endangered) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(lizard, is endangered)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(creeper, is endangered) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(dung beetle, is endangered)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(creeper, is endangered) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(dung beetle, is endangered) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(dung beetle, is endangered)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(creeper, is endangered) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
Remarkable(lizard, is endangered) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(lizard, is endangered)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(creeper, is endangered) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(tree frog, is endangered) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(tree frog, is endangered)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(creeper, is endangered) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(creeper, is endangered)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(creeper, is endangered) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(creeper, is endangered) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(creeper, is endangered)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(creeper, is endangered) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(creeper, is endangered)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(creeper, is endangered) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(dung beetle, is endangered)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(creeper, is endangered) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(tree frog, is endangered)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(creeper, is endangered) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(lizard, is endangered)