crime: be in london

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents conspiracy
Weight: 0.63
, tragedy
Weight: 0.61
, action
Weight: 0.60
, attack
Weight: 0.58
Siblings arson
Weight: 0.70
, sexual harassment
Weight: 0.69
, cruelty
Weight: 0.68
, pedophilia
Weight: 0.68
, drunk driving
Weight: 0.68

Related properties

Property Similarity
be in london 1.00
be in up london 0.97
be high in london 0.96
increase in london 0.93
was problem in london 0.92
was problem in victorian london 0.91
happening in london 0.88
be in toronto 0.80
be in up toronto 0.79
be in chicago 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.28
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(attack, happening in london)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(crime, be in london)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(crime, be in london)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(attack, happening in london)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.48
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(crime, be in london)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(attack, happening in london)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.28
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(attack, happening in london)
Evidence: 0.25
Remarkable(crime, be in london)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(crime, be in london)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(crime, be in london)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Salient(crime, be in london)

Similarity expansion

0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(crime, be in london)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(crime, increase in london)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.29
Salient(crime, be in london)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Salient(crime, increase in london)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.25
Remarkable(crime, be in london)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(crime, be in up london)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.29
Salient(crime, be in london)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Salient(crime, be in up london)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.25
Remarkable(crime, be in london)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(crime, increase in london)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(crime, be in london)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(crime, be in up london)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(crime, be in london)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(crime, increase in london)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(crime, be in london)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(crime, be in up london)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.29
Salient(crime, be in london)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Salient(crime, be high in london)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.25
Remarkable(crime, be in london)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(crime, be high in london)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(crime, be in london)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(crime, be high in london)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(crime, be in london)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(crime, be high in london)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(crime, be in london)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(crime, be in up toronto)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.25
Remarkable(crime, be in london)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(crime, be in up toronto)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.29
Salient(crime, be in london)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Salient(crime, be in up toronto)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(crime, be in london)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(crime, be in up toronto)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(crime, be in london)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(crime, was problem in london)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(crime, be in london)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(crime, was problem in victorian london)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.25
Remarkable(crime, be in london)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(crime, was problem in victorian london)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.25
Remarkable(crime, be in london)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(crime, was problem in london)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(crime, be in london)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(crime, was problem in london)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(crime, be in london)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(crime, was problem in victorian london)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.29
Salient(crime, be in london)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Salient(crime, was problem in victorian london)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.29
Salient(crime, be in london)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(crime, was problem in london)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
Salient(crime, be in london)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(crime, be in london)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(crime, be in london)

Typical implies Plausible

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(crime, be in london)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(crime, be in london)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(crime, be in london)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(attack, happening in london)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.64
Typical(crime, be in london)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(attack, happening in london)