crime: be in prison

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents conspiracy
Weight: 0.63
, tragedy
Weight: 0.61
, action
Weight: 0.60
, attack
Weight: 0.58
Siblings arson
Weight: 0.70
, sexual harassment
Weight: 0.69
, cruelty
Weight: 0.68
, pedophilia
Weight: 0.68
, drunk driving
Weight: 0.68

Related properties

Property Similarity
be in prison 1.00
is jail 0.92
jail 0.92
is jail time 0.91
be committed in prison 0.87
be committed within prison 0.84
be in prisons 0.83
be in female prisons 0.81

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(crime, be in prison)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(arson, is jail)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(crime, be in prison)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(arson, jail)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(crime, be in prison)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(arson, is jail time)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(crime, be in prison)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(sexual harassment, be in prisons)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(crime, be in prison)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(sexual harassment, be in female prisons)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(crime, be in prison)
Evidence: 0.12
Remarkable(arson, is jail)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(arson, is jail)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(crime, be in prison)
Evidence: 0.06
Remarkable(arson, is jail time)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(arson, is jail time)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(crime, be in prison)
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(arson, jail)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(arson, jail)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(crime, be in prison)
Evidence: 0.29
Remarkable(sexual harassment, be in prisons)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(sexual harassment, be in prisons)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(crime, be in prison)
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(sexual harassment, be in female prisons)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(sexual harassment, be in female prisons)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(crime, be in prison)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Salient(crime, be in prison)

Similarity expansion

0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(crime, be in prison)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(crime, be committed in prison)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.06
Salient(crime, be in prison)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Salient(crime, be committed in prison)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.07
Remarkable(crime, be in prison)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(crime, be committed in prison)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.07
Remarkable(crime, be in prison)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(crime, be committed within prison)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.06
Salient(crime, be in prison)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Salient(crime, be committed within prison)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.27
Typical(crime, be in prison)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(crime, be committed in prison)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(crime, be in prison)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(crime, be committed within prison)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.27
Typical(crime, be in prison)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(crime, be committed within prison)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.06
Salient(crime, be in prison)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(crime, be in prison)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(crime, be in prison)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(crime, be in prison)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(crime, be in prison)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(crime, be in prison)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(arson, is jail)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(crime, be in prison)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(arson, jail)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(crime, be in prison)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(arson, is jail time)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(crime, be in prison)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(sexual harassment, be in prisons)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(crime, be in prison)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(sexual harassment, be in female prisons)