crime: be in up toronto

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents conspiracy
Weight: 0.63
, tragedy
Weight: 0.61
, action
Weight: 0.60
, attack
Weight: 0.58
Siblings arson
Weight: 0.70
, sexual harassment
Weight: 0.69
, cruelty
Weight: 0.68
, pedophilia
Weight: 0.68
, drunk driving
Weight: 0.68

Related properties

Property Similarity
be in up toronto 1.00
be in toronto 0.98
be in up chicago 0.82
be in up london 0.82
be in chicago damn high 0.81
be high in baltimore 0.80
be high in chicago 0.80
be in chicago high 0.80
be in chicago 0.80
be in london 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(crime, be in up toronto)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Salient(crime, be in up toronto)

Similarity expansion

0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.10
Remarkable(crime, be in up toronto)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(crime, be in up london)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.10
Remarkable(crime, be in up toronto)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(crime, be high in chicago)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.11
Salient(crime, be in up toronto)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Salient(crime, be in up london)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.11
Salient(crime, be in up toronto)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Salient(crime, be high in chicago)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(crime, be in up toronto)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(crime, be high in chicago)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(crime, be in up toronto)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(crime, be in up london)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.10
Remarkable(crime, be in up toronto)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(crime, be in london)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.11
Salient(crime, be in up toronto)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Salient(crime, be in london)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.42
Typical(crime, be in up toronto)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(crime, be in up london)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.42
Typical(crime, be in up toronto)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(crime, be high in chicago)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(crime, be in up toronto)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(crime, be in london)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.42
Typical(crime, be in up toronto)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(crime, be in london)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.11
Salient(crime, be in up toronto)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(crime, be in up toronto)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(crime, be in up toronto)

Typical implies Plausible

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(crime, be in up toronto)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(crime, be in up toronto)