crime: be negatively affecting businesses

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents conspiracy
Weight: 0.63
, tragedy
Weight: 0.61
, action
Weight: 0.60
, attack
Weight: 0.58
Siblings arson
Weight: 0.70
, sexual harassment
Weight: 0.69
, cruelty
Weight: 0.68
, pedophilia
Weight: 0.68
, drunk driving
Weight: 0.68

Related properties

Property Similarity
be negatively affecting businesses 1.00
affect businesses 0.89
affect business 0.86
affect on business 0.85
affect people 0.83
affect economy 0.82
negatively impact ocean ecosystems 0.81
affect environment 0.81
affect community 0.80
affect quality 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.28
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(action, affect environment)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(crime, be negatively affecting businesses)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(action, negatively impact ocean ecosystems)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(crime, be negatively affecting businesses)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(crime, be negatively affecting businesses)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(action, negatively impact ocean ecosystems)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(crime, be negatively affecting businesses)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(action, affect environment)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.45
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(crime, be negatively affecting businesses)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(action, negatively impact ocean ecosystems)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(crime, be negatively affecting businesses)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(action, affect environment)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.27
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(action, affect environment)
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(crime, be negatively affecting businesses)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(crime, be negatively affecting businesses)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(action, negatively impact ocean ecosystems)
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(crime, be negatively affecting businesses)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(crime, be negatively affecting businesses)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(crime, be negatively affecting businesses)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Salient(crime, be negatively affecting businesses)

Similarity expansion

0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.58
Typical(crime, be negatively affecting businesses)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(crime, affect people)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(crime, be negatively affecting businesses)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(crime, affect people)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.58
Typical(crime, be negatively affecting businesses)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(crime, affect community)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.45
Salient(crime, be negatively affecting businesses)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Salient(crime, affect people)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(crime, be negatively affecting businesses)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(crime, affect community)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(crime, be negatively affecting businesses)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(crime, affect community)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.45
Salient(crime, be negatively affecting businesses)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Salient(crime, affect community)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(crime, be negatively affecting businesses)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(crime, affect people)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
Salient(crime, be negatively affecting businesses)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(crime, be negatively affecting businesses)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(crime, be negatively affecting businesses)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(crime, be negatively affecting businesses)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(crime, be negatively affecting businesses)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(crime, be negatively affecting businesses)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(action, affect environment)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(crime, be negatively affecting businesses)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(action, negatively impact ocean ecosystems)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.58
Typical(crime, be negatively affecting businesses)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(action, affect environment)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.58
Typical(crime, be negatively affecting businesses)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(action, negatively impact ocean ecosystems)