crime: be thought socially constructed

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents conspiracy
Weight: 0.63
, tragedy
Weight: 0.61
, action
Weight: 0.60
, attack
Weight: 0.58
Siblings arson
Weight: 0.70
, sexual harassment
Weight: 0.69
, cruelty
Weight: 0.68
, pedophilia
Weight: 0.68
, drunk driving
Weight: 0.68

Related properties

Property Similarity
be thought socially constructed 1.00
be thought constructed 0.92
be considered social construct 0.82
be considered construct 0.80
is social construct 0.77
is socially unacceptable 0.77
is socially legally unacceptable 0.77
be different from thought 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(crime, be thought socially constructed)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(pedophilia, is socially legally unacceptable)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(crime, be thought socially constructed)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(pedophilia, is socially unacceptable)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(crime, be thought socially constructed)
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(pedophilia, is socially unacceptable)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Plausible(pedophilia, is socially unacceptable)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(crime, be thought socially constructed)
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(pedophilia, is socially legally unacceptable)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(pedophilia, is socially legally unacceptable)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(crime, be thought socially constructed)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Salient(crime, be thought socially constructed)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.18
Salient(crime, be thought socially constructed)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(crime, be thought socially constructed)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(crime, be thought socially constructed)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(crime, be thought socially constructed)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(crime, be thought socially constructed)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(crime, be thought socially constructed)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(pedophilia, is socially unacceptable)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(crime, be thought socially constructed)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(pedophilia, is socially legally unacceptable)