criminal: appeal to high court

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents person
Weight: 0.64
Siblings terrorist
Weight: 0.62
, drug dealer
Weight: 0.62

Related properties

Property Similarity
appeal to high court 1.00
lie to court 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.28
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(criminal, appeal to high court) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Salient(criminal, appeal to high court)

Similarity expansion

0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(criminal, appeal to high court) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(criminal, lie to court)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.05
Salient(criminal, appeal to high court) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Salient(criminal, lie to court)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(criminal, appeal to high court) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(criminal, lie to court)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.07
Remarkable(criminal, appeal to high court) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(criminal, lie to court)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.05
Salient(criminal, appeal to high court) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(criminal, appeal to high court) ⋁
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(criminal, appeal to high court)

Typical implies Plausible

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(criminal, appeal to high court) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(criminal, appeal to high court)