criminal: get caught

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents person
Weight: 0.64
, individual
Weight: 0.61
, subject
Weight: 0.59
, other people
Weight: 0.54
Siblings child molester
Weight: 0.68
, drug addict
Weight: 0.67
, hacker
Weight: 0.63
, terrorist
Weight: 0.62
, drug dealer
Weight: 0.62

Related properties

Property Similarity
get caught 1.00
were caught in victorian times 0.83
were caught in medieval times 0.81

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(criminal, get caught) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(drug dealer, get caught)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(criminal, get caught) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(hacker, get caught)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(criminal, get caught) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(hacker, get caught) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(hacker, get caught)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(criminal, get caught) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(drug dealer, get caught) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(drug dealer, get caught)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(criminal, get caught) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Salient(criminal, get caught)

Similarity expansion

0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(criminal, get caught) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(criminal, were caught in victorian times)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.37
Salient(criminal, get caught) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Salient(criminal, were caught in victorian times)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(criminal, get caught) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(criminal, were caught in victorian times)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.39
Remarkable(criminal, get caught) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(criminal, were caught in medieval times)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.37
Salient(criminal, get caught) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Salient(criminal, were caught in medieval times)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(criminal, get caught) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(criminal, were caught in medieval times)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.57
Typical(criminal, get caught) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(criminal, were caught in victorian times)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.57
Typical(criminal, get caught) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(criminal, were caught in medieval times)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
Salient(criminal, get caught) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(criminal, get caught) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(criminal, get caught)

Typical implies Plausible

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(criminal, get caught) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(criminal, get caught)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(criminal, get caught) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(hacker, get caught)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(criminal, get caught) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(drug dealer, get caught)