criminal: going back to jail

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents person
Weight: 0.64
, individual
Weight: 0.61
, subject
Weight: 0.59
, other people
Weight: 0.54
Siblings child molester
Weight: 0.68
, drug addict
Weight: 0.67
, hacker
Weight: 0.63
, terrorist
Weight: 0.62
, drug dealer
Weight: 0.62

Related properties

Property Similarity
going back to jail 1.00
go to jail 0.94
be put in jail 0.92
be kept in jail 0.88
return to prison 0.83
be extradited to us 0.77
get extradited 0.75
be sentenced to multiple life sentences 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(criminal, going back to jail)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(drug dealer, go to jail)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(criminal, going back to jail)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(drug addict, be put in jail)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(criminal, going back to jail)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(drug addict, go to jail)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.52
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(criminal, going back to jail)
Evidence: 0.15
Remarkable(drug dealer, go to jail)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(drug dealer, go to jail)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(criminal, going back to jail)
Evidence: 0.20
Remarkable(drug addict, be put in jail)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(drug addict, be put in jail)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(criminal, going back to jail)
Evidence: 0.38
Remarkable(drug addict, go to jail)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(drug addict, go to jail)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(criminal, going back to jail)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Salient(criminal, going back to jail)

Similarity expansion

0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(criminal, going back to jail)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(criminal, return to prison)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(criminal, going back to jail)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(criminal, return to prison)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.29
Salient(criminal, going back to jail)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Salient(criminal, return to prison)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(criminal, going back to jail)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(criminal, be kept in jail)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.29
Salient(criminal, going back to jail)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Salient(criminal, be kept in jail)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(criminal, going back to jail)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(criminal, be kept in jail)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(criminal, going back to jail)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(criminal, go to jail)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(criminal, going back to jail)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(criminal, be put in jail)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(criminal, going back to jail)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(criminal, be kept in jail)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(criminal, going back to jail)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(criminal, be sentenced to multiple life sentences)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(criminal, going back to jail)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(criminal, be sentenced to multiple life sentences)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.29
Salient(criminal, going back to jail)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Salient(criminal, be sentenced to multiple life sentences)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(criminal, going back to jail)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(criminal, be extradited to us)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(criminal, going back to jail)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(criminal, return to prison)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(criminal, going back to jail)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Remarkable(criminal, be extradited to us)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.29
Salient(criminal, going back to jail)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Salient(criminal, be extradited to us)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(criminal, going back to jail)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(criminal, be put in jail)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.29
Salient(criminal, going back to jail)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Salient(criminal, be put in jail)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(criminal, going back to jail)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(criminal, be put in jail)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(criminal, going back to jail)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(criminal, be sentenced to multiple life sentences)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.29
Salient(criminal, going back to jail)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Salient(criminal, go to jail)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(criminal, going back to jail)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(criminal, go to jail)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(criminal, going back to jail)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(criminal, go to jail)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.67
Typical(criminal, going back to jail)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(criminal, be extradited to us)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
Salient(criminal, going back to jail)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(criminal, going back to jail)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(criminal, going back to jail)

Typical implies Plausible

0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(criminal, going back to jail)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(criminal, going back to jail)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(criminal, going back to jail)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(drug dealer, go to jail)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(criminal, going back to jail)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(drug addict, be put in jail)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(criminal, going back to jail)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(drug addict, go to jail)