criminal: was treated in 1800

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents person
Weight: 0.64
, individual
Weight: 0.61
, subject
Weight: 0.59
, other people
Weight: 0.54
Siblings child molester
Weight: 0.68
, drug addict
Weight: 0.67
, hacker
Weight: 0.63
, terrorist
Weight: 0.62
, drug dealer
Weight: 0.62

Related properties

Property Similarity
was treated in 1800 1.00
were treated in middle ages 0.81
were treated during holocaust 0.80
were dealt 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(criminal, was treated in 1800) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Salient(criminal, was treated in 1800)

Similarity expansion

0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(criminal, was treated in 1800) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(criminal, were treated in middle ages)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.20
Salient(criminal, was treated in 1800) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Salient(criminal, were treated in middle ages)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.16
Remarkable(criminal, was treated in 1800) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(criminal, were treated in middle ages)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.58
Typical(criminal, was treated in 1800) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(criminal, were treated in middle ages)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.58
Typical(criminal, was treated in 1800) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(criminal, were dealt)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.16
Remarkable(criminal, was treated in 1800) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(criminal, were treated during holocaust)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(criminal, was treated in 1800) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(criminal, were dealt)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.58
Typical(criminal, was treated in 1800) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(criminal, were treated during holocaust)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.20
Salient(criminal, was treated in 1800) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Salient(criminal, were dealt)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.20
Salient(criminal, was treated in 1800) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Salient(criminal, were treated during holocaust)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(criminal, was treated in 1800) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(criminal, were treated during holocaust)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.16
Remarkable(criminal, was treated in 1800) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(criminal, were dealt)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.20
Salient(criminal, was treated in 1800) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(criminal, was treated in 1800) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(criminal, was treated in 1800)

Typical implies Plausible

0.28
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
Plausible(criminal, was treated in 1800) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(criminal, was treated in 1800)