criminal: were treated during holocaust

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents person
Weight: 0.64
, individual
Weight: 0.61
, subject
Weight: 0.59
, other people
Weight: 0.54
Siblings child molester
Weight: 0.68
, drug addict
Weight: 0.67
, hacker
Weight: 0.63
, terrorist
Weight: 0.62
, drug dealer
Weight: 0.62

Related properties

Property Similarity
were treated during holocaust 1.00
were killed in holocaust 0.90
was treated in 1800 0.80
were treated in middle ages 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(criminal, were treated during holocaust) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Salient(criminal, were treated during holocaust)

Similarity expansion

0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(criminal, were treated during holocaust) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(criminal, were killed in holocaust)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.27
Remarkable(criminal, were treated during holocaust) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(criminal, were killed in holocaust)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(criminal, were treated during holocaust) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(criminal, were treated in middle ages)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.44
Salient(criminal, were treated during holocaust) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Salient(criminal, were treated in middle ages)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.27
Remarkable(criminal, were treated during holocaust) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(criminal, were treated in middle ages)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(criminal, were treated during holocaust) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(criminal, was treated in 1800)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.44
Salient(criminal, were treated during holocaust) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Salient(criminal, was treated in 1800)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.82
Typical(criminal, were treated during holocaust) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(criminal, were treated in middle ages)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(criminal, were treated during holocaust) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(criminal, was treated in 1800)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.44
Salient(criminal, were treated during holocaust) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Salient(criminal, were killed in holocaust)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.27
Remarkable(criminal, were treated during holocaust) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(criminal, was treated in 1800)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(criminal, were treated during holocaust) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(criminal, were killed in holocaust)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.44
Salient(criminal, were treated during holocaust) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(criminal, were treated during holocaust) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(criminal, were treated during holocaust)

Typical implies Plausible

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
Plausible(criminal, were treated during holocaust) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(criminal, were treated during holocaust)