critic: give bad reviews

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents writer
Weight: 0.72
, author
Weight: 0.59
, friend
Weight: 0.57
, authority
Weight: 0.57
, reaction
Weight: 0.56
Siblings journalist
Weight: 0.36
, novelist
Weight: 0.34
, historian
Weight: 0.34
, poet
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
give bad reviews 1.00
give reviews 0.97
is reviews 0.92
is review 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(critic, give bad reviews)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Salient(critic, give bad reviews)

Similarity expansion

0.82
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.99
Typical(critic, give bad reviews)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(critic, give reviews)
0.82
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(critic, give bad reviews)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Salient(critic, give reviews)
0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(critic, give bad reviews)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(critic, give reviews)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.99
Typical(critic, give bad reviews)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Typical(critic, is reviews)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(critic, give bad reviews)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Salient(critic, is reviews)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(critic, give bad reviews)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(critic, is reviews)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.99
Typical(critic, give bad reviews)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(critic, is review)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(critic, give bad reviews)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Salient(critic, is review)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(critic, give bad reviews)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(critic, is review)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.97
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(critic, give bad reviews)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(critic, give reviews)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(critic, give bad reviews)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(critic, is reviews)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(critic, give bad reviews)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(critic, is review)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.98
Salient(critic, give bad reviews)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(critic, give bad reviews)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(critic, give bad reviews)

Typical implies Plausible

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(critic, give bad reviews)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(critic, give bad reviews)