critic: has quality definition

Related concepts

Parents	writer Weight: 0.72 , author Weight: 0.59 , friend Weight: 0.57 , authority Weight: 0.57 , reaction Weight: 0.56
Siblings	journalist Weight: 0.36 , novelist Weight: 0.34 , historian Weight: 0.34 , poet Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property	Similarity
has quality definition	1.00
have standards	0.77
has quality good	0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.44

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.82

Plausible(authority, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.71

¬ Typical(critic, has quality definition)

0.44

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.81

Plausible(friend, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.71

¬ Typical(critic, has quality definition)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.71

Plausible(critic, has quality definition) ⋁

Evidence: 0.81

¬ Plausible(friend, has quality good)

0.05

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.71

Plausible(critic, has quality definition) ⋁

Evidence: 0.82

¬ Plausible(authority, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.21

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.75

¬ Remarkable(critic, has quality definition) ⋁

Evidence: 0.69

¬ Remarkable(authority, has quality good)

0.16

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.75

¬ Remarkable(critic, has quality definition) ⋁

Evidence: 0.85

¬ Remarkable(friend, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.04

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.75

¬ Remarkable(critic, has quality definition) ⋁

Evidence: 0.81

¬ Remarkable(journalist, has quality good)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.82

Plausible(authority, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.75

Remarkable(critic, has quality definition) ⋁

Evidence: 0.71

¬ Plausible(critic, has quality definition)

0.31

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.81

Plausible(friend, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.75

Remarkable(critic, has quality definition) ⋁

Evidence: 0.71

¬ Plausible(critic, has quality definition)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.44

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.71

Plausible(critic, has quality definition) ⋁

Evidence: 0.81

Remarkable(journalist, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.75

¬ Plausible(journalist, has quality good)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.71

Plausible(critic, has quality definition) ⋁

Evidence: 0.84

¬ Salient(critic, has quality definition)

Similarity expansion

0.63

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.71

Typical(critic, has quality definition) ⋁

Evidence: 0.17

¬ Typical(critic, have standards)

0.59

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.84

Salient(critic, has quality definition) ⋁

Evidence: 0.56

¬ Salient(critic, has quality good)

0.59

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.84

Salient(critic, has quality definition) ⋁

Evidence: 0.64

¬ Salient(critic, have standards)

0.58

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.71

Plausible(critic, has quality definition) ⋁

Evidence: 0.40

¬ Plausible(critic, have standards)

0.56

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.75

Remarkable(critic, has quality definition) ⋁

Evidence: 0.54

¬ Remarkable(critic, has quality good)

0.55

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.71

Plausible(critic, has quality definition) ⋁

Evidence: 0.53

¬ Plausible(critic, has quality good)

0.54

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.71

Typical(critic, has quality definition) ⋁

Evidence: 0.60

¬ Typical(critic, has quality good)

0.51

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.77

Evidence: 0.75

Remarkable(critic, has quality definition) ⋁

Evidence: 0.94

¬ Remarkable(critic, have standards)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.84

Salient(critic, has quality definition) ⋁

Evidence: 0.71

¬ Typical(critic, has quality definition) ⋁

Evidence: 0.75

¬ Remarkable(critic, has quality definition)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.71

Plausible(critic, has quality definition) ⋁

Evidence: 0.71

¬ Typical(critic, has quality definition)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.16

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.75

¬ Remarkable(critic, has quality definition) ⋁

Evidence: 0.78

¬ Typical(friend, has quality good)

0.14

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.75

¬ Remarkable(critic, has quality definition) ⋁

Evidence: 0.85

¬ Typical(authority, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.05

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.75

¬ Remarkable(critic, has quality definition) ⋁

Evidence: 0.71

¬ Typical(journalist, has quality good)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.29

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.71

Typical(critic, has quality definition) ⋁

Evidence: 0.78

¬ Typical(friend, has quality good)

0.28

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.71

Typical(critic, has quality definition) ⋁

Evidence: 0.85

¬ Typical(authority, has quality good)