crocodile: be vs alligator

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents creature
Weight: 0.77
, reptile
Weight: 0.72
, wild animal
Weight: 0.63
, skin
Weight: 0.61
, thing
Weight: 0.58
Siblings saltwater crocodile
Weight: 0.82
, whale shark
Weight: 0.40
, lizard
Weight: 0.40
, hammerhead shark
Weight: 0.39
, alligator
Weight: 0.39

Related properties

Property Similarity
be vs alligator 1.00
be different from alligators 0.84
be different than alligators 0.84
be called crocodile 0.81
is reptile 0.81
crocodile in black mirror 0.80
be called crocodile in black mirror 0.80
be called crocodile black mirror 0.80
crocodile in mirror 0.80
be called crocodile in mirror 0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(crocodile, be vs alligator) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(lizard, is reptile)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(crocodile, be vs alligator) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(lizard, is reptile) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(lizard, is reptile)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(crocodile, be vs alligator) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Salient(crocodile, be vs alligator)

Similarity expansion

0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.51
Typical(crocodile, be vs alligator) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(crocodile, is reptile)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(crocodile, be vs alligator) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(crocodile, is reptile)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.37
Salient(crocodile, be vs alligator) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Salient(crocodile, is reptile)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.38
Remarkable(crocodile, be vs alligator) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(crocodile, is reptile)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.37
Salient(crocodile, be vs alligator) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(crocodile, be vs alligator) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(crocodile, be vs alligator)

Typical implies Plausible

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(crocodile, be vs alligator) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Typical(crocodile, be vs alligator)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(crocodile, be vs alligator) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(lizard, is reptile)