crop: be good for wisconsin

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents commodity
Weight: 0.63
, feature
Weight: 0.59
, topic
Weight: 0.56
, food
Weight: 0.56
Siblings sunflower
Weight: 0.74
, barley
Weight: 0.73
, clover
Weight: 0.73
, cereal grain
Weight: 0.72
, milo
Weight: 0.71

Related properties

Property Similarity
be good for wisconsin 1.00
grow in minnesota 0.82
be in florida help people 0.81
was hard for england 0.78
was hard for new england 0.77
grow fast in alaska 0.76
grow quickly in alaska 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(crop, be good for wisconsin)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Salient(crop, be good for wisconsin)

Similarity expansion

0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(crop, be good for wisconsin)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(crop, be in florida help people)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(crop, be good for wisconsin)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Salient(crop, be in florida help people)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(crop, be good for wisconsin)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(crop, be in florida help people)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(crop, be good for wisconsin)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(crop, be in florida help people)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(crop, be good for wisconsin)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(crop, grow in minnesota)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(crop, be good for wisconsin)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Salient(crop, grow in minnesota)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(crop, be good for wisconsin)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(crop, grow in minnesota)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(crop, be good for wisconsin)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(crop, grow in minnesota)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(crop, be good for wisconsin)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(crop, was hard for england)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(crop, be good for wisconsin)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(crop, was hard for new england)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(crop, be good for wisconsin)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(crop, grow fast in alaska)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(crop, be good for wisconsin)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(crop, grow quickly in alaska)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(crop, be good for wisconsin)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(crop, was hard for england)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(crop, be good for wisconsin)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(crop, was hard for england)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(crop, be good for wisconsin)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(crop, grow fast in alaska)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(crop, be good for wisconsin)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Salient(crop, grow fast in alaska)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(crop, be good for wisconsin)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(crop, was hard for new england)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(crop, be good for wisconsin)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(crop, grow quickly in alaska)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(crop, be good for wisconsin)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(crop, grow quickly in alaska)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(crop, be good for wisconsin)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(crop, was hard for new england)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(crop, be good for wisconsin)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Remarkable(crop, grow fast in alaska)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(crop, be good for wisconsin)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(crop, grow quickly in alaska)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(crop, be good for wisconsin)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(crop, was hard for england)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.44
Remarkable(crop, be good for wisconsin)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(crop, was hard for new england)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Salient(crop, be good for wisconsin)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(crop, be good for wisconsin)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(crop, be good for wisconsin)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Plausible(crop, be good for wisconsin)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(crop, be good for wisconsin)