cross country skiing: be judged

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents skiing
Weight: 0.77
, sport
Weight: 0.73
, activity
Weight: 0.65
, winter
Weight: 0.63
, adventure
Weight: 0.59
Siblings cross country
Weight: 0.39
, snow skiing
Weight: 0.39
, snowboarding
Weight: 0.38
, ski
Weight: 0.37
, mountain climbing
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
be judged 1.00

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.48
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(skiing, be judged)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(cross country skiing, be judged)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(cross country skiing, be judged)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(skiing, be judged)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(cross country skiing, be judged)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(skiing, be judged)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(cross country skiing, be judged)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(snowboarding, be judged)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(cross country skiing, be judged)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(ski, be judged)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Plausible(skiing, be judged)
Evidence: 0.67
Remarkable(cross country skiing, be judged)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(cross country skiing, be judged)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(cross country skiing, be judged)
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(ski, be judged)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(ski, be judged)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(cross country skiing, be judged)
Evidence: 0.31
Remarkable(snowboarding, be judged)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Plausible(snowboarding, be judged)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(cross country skiing, be judged)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(cross country skiing, be judged)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.97
Salient(cross country skiing, be judged)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(cross country skiing, be judged)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(cross country skiing, be judged)

Typical implies Plausible

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(cross country skiing, be judged)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(cross country skiing, be judged)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.23
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(cross country skiing, be judged)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(skiing, be judged)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(cross country skiing, be judged)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(ski, be judged)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(cross country skiing, be judged)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(snowboarding, be judged)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Typical(cross country skiing, be judged)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(skiing, be judged)