cross street: be used to pedestrian

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents landmark
Weight: 0.56
, location
Weight: 0.55
, address
Weight: 0.50
, car
Weight: 0.50
, information
Weight: 0.47
Siblings sidewalk
Weight: 0.32
, intersection
Weight: 0.32
, golden gate bridge
Weight: 0.32
, bridge
Weight: 0.32
, neighborhood
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be used to pedestrian 1.00
be used to pedestrian traffic 0.96
near pedestrian 0.95
hit pedestrian 0.95
yield to pedestrian 0.86
requires use crosswalk 0.80
requires crosswalk 0.79
causes traffic accident 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(cross street, be used to pedestrian)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(sidewalk, be used to pedestrian)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(cross street, be used to pedestrian)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Remarkable(sidewalk, be used to pedestrian traffic)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(cross street, be used to pedestrian)
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(sidewalk, be used to pedestrian)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(sidewalk, be used to pedestrian)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(cross street, be used to pedestrian)
Evidence: 0.59
Remarkable(sidewalk, be used to pedestrian traffic)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(sidewalk, be used to pedestrian traffic)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(cross street, be used to pedestrian)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Salient(cross street, be used to pedestrian)

Similarity expansion

0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(cross street, be used to pedestrian)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(cross street, causes traffic accident)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(cross street, be used to pedestrian)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(cross street, requires crosswalk)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.74
Salient(cross street, be used to pedestrian)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Salient(cross street, requires use crosswalk)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.74
Salient(cross street, be used to pedestrian)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Salient(cross street, requires crosswalk)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(cross street, be used to pedestrian)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(cross street, requires use crosswalk)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(cross street, be used to pedestrian)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(cross street, requires use crosswalk)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.74
Salient(cross street, be used to pedestrian)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Salient(cross street, causes traffic accident)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(cross street, be used to pedestrian)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(cross street, requires crosswalk)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.37
Typical(cross street, be used to pedestrian)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(cross street, requires use crosswalk)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.37
Typical(cross street, be used to pedestrian)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(cross street, causes traffic accident)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(cross street, be used to pedestrian)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(cross street, causes traffic accident)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.37
Typical(cross street, be used to pedestrian)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(cross street, requires crosswalk)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Salient(cross street, be used to pedestrian)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(cross street, be used to pedestrian)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(cross street, be used to pedestrian)

Typical implies Plausible

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(cross street, be used to pedestrian)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(cross street, be used to pedestrian)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(cross street, be used to pedestrian)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(sidewalk, be used to pedestrian)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(cross street, be used to pedestrian)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(sidewalk, be used to pedestrian traffic)