crt: going to status

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents device
Weight: 0.64
, display
Weight: 0.55
, electronic device
Weight: 0.53
, personal computer
Weight: 0.51
, keyboard
Weight: 0.47
Siblings computer keyboard
Weight: 0.35
, pda
Weight: 0.35
, laptop computer
Weight: 0.34
, x ray machine
Weight: 0.34
, modem
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
going to status 1.00
going to private status 0.93
going to sub status 0.91
going to private sub status 0.88

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(crt, going to status)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Salient(crt, going to status)

Similarity expansion

0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(crt, going to status)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Plausible(crt, going to private status)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(crt, going to status)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(crt, going to sub status)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(crt, going to status)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Plausible(crt, going to private sub status)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(crt, going to status)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(crt, going to private status)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(crt, going to status)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Remarkable(crt, going to sub status)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.58
Remarkable(crt, going to status)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(crt, going to private sub status)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.69
Salient(crt, going to status)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Salient(crt, going to sub status)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.69
Salient(crt, going to status)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(crt, going to private status)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.56
Typical(crt, going to status)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(crt, going to sub status)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.69
Salient(crt, going to status)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Salient(crt, going to private sub status)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.56
Typical(crt, going to status)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(crt, going to private status)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.56
Typical(crt, going to status)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(crt, going to private sub status)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
Salient(crt, going to status)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(crt, going to status)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(crt, going to status)

Typical implies Plausible

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Plausible(crt, going to status)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(crt, going to status)