crt: have weird rate modes

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents device
Weight: 0.64
, display
Weight: 0.55
, electronic device
Weight: 0.53
, personal computer
Weight: 0.51
, keyboard
Weight: 0.47
Siblings computer keyboard
Weight: 0.35
, pda
Weight: 0.35
, laptop computer
Weight: 0.34
, x ray machine
Weight: 0.34
, modem
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
have weird rate modes 1.00
have rate modes 0.96
have weird refresh rate modes 0.93
have refresh rate modes 0.89
is mode 0.83

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(crt, have weird rate modes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(modem, is mode)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(crt, have weird rate modes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(modem, is mode) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(modem, is mode)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(crt, have weird rate modes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Salient(crt, have weird rate modes)

Similarity expansion

0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(crt, have weird rate modes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(crt, have rate modes)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(crt, have weird rate modes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(crt, have rate modes)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(crt, have weird rate modes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Salient(crt, have rate modes)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(crt, have weird rate modes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(crt, have refresh rate modes)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(crt, have weird rate modes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(crt, have weird refresh rate modes)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(crt, have weird rate modes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Salient(crt, have weird refresh rate modes)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(crt, have weird rate modes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(crt, have weird refresh rate modes)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(crt, have weird rate modes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(crt, have refresh rate modes)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(crt, have weird rate modes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Salient(crt, have refresh rate modes)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(crt, have weird rate modes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(crt, have weird refresh rate modes)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(crt, have weird rate modes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(crt, have rate modes)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(crt, have weird rate modes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(crt, have refresh rate modes)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(crt, have weird rate modes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(crt, have weird rate modes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(crt, have weird rate modes)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Plausible(crt, have weird rate modes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(crt, have weird rate modes)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(crt, have weird rate modes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(modem, is mode)