cruelty: be to animals bad

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents crime
Weight: 0.68
, kindness
Weight: 0.57
, sin
Weight: 0.56
, problem
Weight: 0.55
Siblings starvation
Weight: 0.62
, sexual harassment
Weight: 0.36
, torture
Weight: 0.34
, arson
Weight: 0.34
, pedophilia
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be to animals bad 1.00
be to animals 0.93
be to animals wrong 0.90
affect humans 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(cruelty, be to animals bad)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(starvation, affect humans)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(cruelty, be to animals bad)
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(starvation, affect humans)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(starvation, affect humans)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(cruelty, be to animals bad)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Salient(cruelty, be to animals bad)

Similarity expansion

0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.40
Typical(cruelty, be to animals bad)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(cruelty, be to animals)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(cruelty, be to animals bad)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(cruelty, be to animals)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.34
Salient(cruelty, be to animals bad)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Salient(cruelty, be to animals)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.40
Typical(cruelty, be to animals bad)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(cruelty, be to animals wrong)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(cruelty, be to animals bad)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(cruelty, be to animals wrong)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(cruelty, be to animals bad)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(cruelty, be to animals)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.34
Salient(cruelty, be to animals bad)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Salient(cruelty, be to animals wrong)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.46
Remarkable(cruelty, be to animals bad)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(cruelty, be to animals wrong)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.34
Salient(cruelty, be to animals bad)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(cruelty, be to animals bad)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(cruelty, be to animals bad)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.35
Plausible(cruelty, be to animals bad)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(cruelty, be to animals bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(cruelty, be to animals bad)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(starvation, affect humans)