cruelty: is makeup better

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents crime
Weight: 0.68
, kindness
Weight: 0.57
, sin
Weight: 0.56
, problem
Weight: 0.55
Siblings starvation
Weight: 0.62
, sexual harassment
Weight: 0.36
, torture
Weight: 0.34
, arson
Weight: 0.34
, pedophilia
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
is makeup better 1.00
is makeup important 0.96
is free makeup better 0.95
is free makeup 0.92
is free makeup important 0.91
has constitution makeup 0.84

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(cruelty, is makeup better)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Salient(cruelty, is makeup better)

Similarity expansion

0.81
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.14
Remarkable(cruelty, is makeup better)
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Remarkable(cruelty, is free makeup better)
0.81
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.10
Salient(cruelty, is makeup better)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Salient(cruelty, is free makeup better)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.14
Remarkable(cruelty, is makeup better)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(cruelty, is free makeup important)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.14
Remarkable(cruelty, is makeup better)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(cruelty, is free makeup)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.10
Salient(cruelty, is makeup better)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Salient(cruelty, is free makeup important)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.14
Typical(cruelty, is makeup better)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(cruelty, is free makeup better)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(cruelty, is makeup better)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Plausible(cruelty, is free makeup better)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.10
Salient(cruelty, is makeup better)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Salient(cruelty, is free makeup)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.14
Typical(cruelty, is makeup better)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(cruelty, is makeup important)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.14
Typical(cruelty, is makeup better)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(cruelty, has constitution makeup)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.14
Typical(cruelty, is makeup better)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(cruelty, is free makeup important)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(cruelty, is makeup better)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(cruelty, is free makeup important)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.10
Salient(cruelty, is makeup better)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Salient(cruelty, has constitution makeup)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.14
Typical(cruelty, is makeup better)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(cruelty, is free makeup)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(cruelty, is makeup better)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(cruelty, is free makeup)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.14
Remarkable(cruelty, is makeup better)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(cruelty, has constitution makeup)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(cruelty, is makeup better)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(cruelty, has constitution makeup)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(cruelty, is makeup better)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(cruelty, is makeup important)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.10
Salient(cruelty, is makeup better)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Salient(cruelty, is makeup important)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.14
Remarkable(cruelty, is makeup better)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(cruelty, is makeup important)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.10
Salient(cruelty, is makeup better)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(cruelty, is makeup better)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(cruelty, is makeup better)

Typical implies Plausible

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(cruelty, is makeup better)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Typical(cruelty, is makeup better)