crustacean: be well adapted in shore

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents seafood
Weight: 0.61
, predator
Weight: 0.61
, animal
Weight: 0.60
, invertebrate
Weight: 0.60
, arthropod
Weight: 0.58
Siblings hermit crab
Weight: 0.69
, barnacle
Weight: 0.59
, oyster
Weight: 0.54
, prawn
Weight: 0.51
, cephalopod
Weight: 0.46

Related properties

Property Similarity
be well adapted in shore 1.00
be well adapted in rocky shore 0.93
be well adapted to life 0.86

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(crustacean, be well adapted in shore) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Salient(crustacean, be well adapted in shore)

Similarity expansion

0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(crustacean, be well adapted in shore) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(crustacean, be well adapted in rocky shore)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.40
Salient(crustacean, be well adapted in shore) ⋁
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Salient(crustacean, be well adapted in rocky shore)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(crustacean, be well adapted in shore) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(crustacean, be well adapted in rocky shore)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.93
Evidence: 0.49
Typical(crustacean, be well adapted in shore) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(crustacean, be well adapted in rocky shore)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(crustacean, be well adapted in shore) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(crustacean, be well adapted to life)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.49
Typical(crustacean, be well adapted in shore) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(crustacean, be well adapted to life)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(crustacean, be well adapted in shore) ⋁
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(crustacean, be well adapted to life)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.40
Salient(crustacean, be well adapted in shore) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(crustacean, be well adapted to life)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
Salient(crustacean, be well adapted in shore) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(crustacean, be well adapted in shore) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(crustacean, be well adapted in shore)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(crustacean, be well adapted in shore) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(crustacean, be well adapted in shore)