cry: has quality bad

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents song
Weight: 0.66
, sound
Weight: 0.62
, hit
Weight: 0.57
, thing
Weight: 0.54
Siblings love song
Weight: 0.35
, scream
Weight: 0.34
, shout
Weight: 0.34
, laugh
Weight: 0.33
, know
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality bad 1.00
is out bad 0.81
far is bad 0.81

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(cry, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(scream, has quality bad)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(cry, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(scream, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(scream, has quality bad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(cry, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(cry, has quality bad)

Similarity expansion

0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(cry, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(cry, far is bad)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(cry, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(cry, is out bad)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(cry, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Salient(cry, far is bad)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(cry, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(cry, is out bad)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(cry, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(cry, is out bad)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.53
Typical(cry, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(cry, is out bad)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(cry, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(cry, far is bad)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.53
Typical(cry, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(cry, far is bad)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Salient(cry, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(cry, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(cry, has quality bad)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(cry, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(cry, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(cry, has quality bad) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(scream, has quality bad)