css: is terrible

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents programming language
Weight: 0.66
, format
Weight: 0.60
, javascript
Weight: 0.60
, xml
Weight: 0.58
, language
Weight: 0.58
Siblings ajax
Weight: 0.56
, perl
Weight: 0.36
, php
Weight: 0.36
, smalltalk
Weight: 0.35
, sql
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
is terrible 1.00
is important bad 0.82
has quality bad 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.44
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(language, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(css, is terrible)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(xml, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(css, is terrible)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(javascript, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(css, is terrible)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(programming language, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(css, is terrible)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(css, is terrible)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(programming language, has quality bad)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(css, is terrible)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(javascript, has quality bad)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(css, is terrible)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(xml, has quality bad)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(css, is terrible)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(language, has quality bad)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(css, is terrible)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Remarkable(programming language, has quality bad)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(css, is terrible)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(javascript, has quality bad)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(css, is terrible)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Remarkable(xml, has quality bad)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(css, is terrible)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(language, has quality bad)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(css, is terrible)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(php, is terrible)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(css, is terrible)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(sql, has quality bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(css, is terrible)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(php, has quality bad)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(language, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(css, is terrible)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(css, is terrible)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(xml, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(css, is terrible)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(css, is terrible)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.78
Plausible(javascript, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(css, is terrible)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(css, is terrible)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.66
Plausible(programming language, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(css, is terrible)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(css, is terrible)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(css, is terrible)
Evidence: 0.43
Remarkable(php, is terrible)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(php, is terrible)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(css, is terrible)
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(sql, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(sql, has quality bad)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(css, is terrible)
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(php, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(php, has quality bad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(css, is terrible)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Salient(css, is terrible)

Similarity expansion

0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(css, is terrible)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(css, is important bad)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(css, is terrible)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(css, has quality bad)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.74
Salient(css, is terrible)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(css, is important bad)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(css, is terrible)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(css, is important bad)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.74
Salient(css, is terrible)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(css, has quality bad)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(css, is terrible)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(css, has quality bad)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(css, is terrible)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(css, is important bad)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(css, is terrible)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(css, has quality bad)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.74
Salient(css, is terrible)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(css, is terrible)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(css, is terrible)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(css, is terrible)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(css, is terrible)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.23
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(css, is terrible)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(programming language, has quality bad)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(css, is terrible)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(xml, has quality bad)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(css, is terrible)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(language, has quality bad)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(css, is terrible)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(javascript, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(css, is terrible)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(php, is terrible)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(css, is terrible)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(sql, has quality bad)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(css, is terrible)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(php, has quality bad)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(css, is terrible)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(programming language, has quality bad)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(css, is terrible)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(xml, has quality bad)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(css, is terrible)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(language, has quality bad)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.80
Typical(css, is terrible)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(javascript, has quality bad)