ctr: have access

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents thing
Weight: 0.43
, factor
Weight: 0.40
, performance
Weight: 0.38
, report
Weight: 0.37
, traffic
Weight: 0.36
Siblings sherlock holmes
Weight: 0.30
, florence
Weight: 0.29
, puerto rican
Weight: 0.29
, montreal
Weight: 0.29
, mcdonalds
Weight: 0.29

Related properties

Property Similarity
have access 1.00
have access to nsa cyber tools 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(ctr, have access) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Salient(ctr, have access)

Similarity expansion

0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(ctr, have access) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(ctr, have access to nsa cyber tools)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.66
Salient(ctr, have access) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(ctr, have access to nsa cyber tools)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(ctr, have access) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(ctr, have access to nsa cyber tools)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.19
Typical(ctr, have access) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(ctr, have access to nsa cyber tools)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.66
Salient(ctr, have access) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(ctr, have access) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(ctr, have access)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.41
Plausible(ctr, have access) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(ctr, have access)