cub: be 100-win team in year of tanking

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents organization
Weight: 0.51
, club
Weight: 0.50
, team
Weight: 0.50
, animal
Weight: 0.49
, thing
Weight: 0.48
Siblings panda bear
Weight: 0.34
, panda
Weight: 0.34
, grizzly bear
Weight: 0.33
, orangutan
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be 100-win team in year of tanking 1.00
be 100-win team in year 0.81
be bad year 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(cub, be 100-win team in year of tanking) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Salient(cub, be 100-win team in year of tanking)

Similarity expansion

0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.10
Remarkable(cub, be 100-win team in year of tanking) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(cub, be 100-win team in year)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.14
Salient(cub, be 100-win team in year of tanking) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Salient(cub, be 100-win team in year)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(cub, be 100-win team in year of tanking) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(cub, be 100-win team in year)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.49
Typical(cub, be 100-win team in year of tanking) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(cub, be 100-win team in year)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.10
Remarkable(cub, be 100-win team in year of tanking) ⋁
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(cub, be bad year)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.14
Salient(cub, be 100-win team in year of tanking) ⋁
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Salient(cub, be bad year)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.49
Typical(cub, be 100-win team in year of tanking) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(cub, be bad year)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(cub, be 100-win team in year of tanking) ⋁
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Plausible(cub, be bad year)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.14
Salient(cub, be 100-win team in year of tanking) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(cub, be 100-win team in year of tanking) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(cub, be 100-win team in year of tanking)

Typical implies Plausible

0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.18
Plausible(cub, be 100-win team in year of tanking) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(cub, be 100-win team in year of tanking)