cunt: be such inflammatory word for women

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents word
Weight: 0.68
, thing
Weight: 0.61
, name
Weight: 0.59
, term
Weight: 0.51
Siblings f word
Weight: 0.37
, whore
Weight: 0.37
, bitch
Weight: 0.36
, shit
Weight: 0.36
, fuck
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
be such inflammatory word for women 1.00
be such dirty word in antarctica 0.78
is bad word 0.77
be such taboo word in america 0.75
is word 0.75
is most offensive swear word 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(cunt, be such inflammatory word for women)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(fuck, is bad word)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(cunt, be such inflammatory word for women)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(fuck, is word)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(cunt, be such inflammatory word for women)
Evidence: 0.05
Remarkable(fuck, is bad word)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Plausible(fuck, is bad word)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(cunt, be such inflammatory word for women)
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(fuck, is word)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(fuck, is word)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(cunt, be such inflammatory word for women)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Salient(cunt, be such inflammatory word for women)

Similarity expansion

0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(cunt, be such inflammatory word for women)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(cunt, is word)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(cunt, be such inflammatory word for women)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(cunt, is bad word)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(cunt, be such inflammatory word for women)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(cunt, be such dirty word in antarctica)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(cunt, be such inflammatory word for women)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(cunt, is word)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(cunt, be such inflammatory word for women)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(cunt, is most offensive swear word)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.89
Typical(cunt, be such inflammatory word for women)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(cunt, be such taboo word in america)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(cunt, be such inflammatory word for women)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(cunt, is bad word)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(cunt, be such inflammatory word for women)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(cunt, be such dirty word in antarctica)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.68
Salient(cunt, be such inflammatory word for women)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Salient(cunt, is word)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(cunt, be such inflammatory word for women)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Plausible(cunt, is most offensive swear word)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.68
Salient(cunt, be such inflammatory word for women)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Salient(cunt, is bad word)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(cunt, be such inflammatory word for women)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(cunt, be such taboo word in america)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.68
Salient(cunt, be such inflammatory word for women)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Salient(cunt, be such dirty word in antarctica)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.68
Salient(cunt, be such inflammatory word for women)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Salient(cunt, is most offensive swear word)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(cunt, be such inflammatory word for women)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(cunt, be such dirty word in antarctica)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(cunt, be such inflammatory word for women)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(cunt, is most offensive swear word)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.68
Salient(cunt, be such inflammatory word for women)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(cunt, be such taboo word in america)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(cunt, be such inflammatory word for women)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(cunt, is bad word)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(cunt, be such inflammatory word for women)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(cunt, be such taboo word in america)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(cunt, be such inflammatory word for women)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(cunt, is word)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Salient(cunt, be such inflammatory word for women)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(cunt, be such inflammatory word for women)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(cunt, be such inflammatory word for women)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(cunt, be such inflammatory word for women)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(cunt, be such inflammatory word for women)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(cunt, be such inflammatory word for women)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(fuck, is word)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(cunt, be such inflammatory word for women)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(fuck, is bad word)