cup: be different than dry

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents container
Weight: 0.69
, item
Weight: 0.61
, kitchen utensil
Weight: 0.60
, bowl
Weight: 0.59
Siblings coffee cup
Weight: 0.73
, ramekin
Weight: 0.37
, jug
Weight: 0.35
, coffee mug
Weight: 0.35
, wooden spoon
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be different than dry 1.00
is dry clean 0.84
is different colours 0.79
have different prices for different color 0.79
fall through water easier than oil 0.76
smell like wet dog 0.75
have more expensive than in 1933 today 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(item, have more expensive than in 1933 today)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(cup, be different than dry)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(container, is different colours)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(cup, be different than dry)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(item, fall through water easier than oil)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(cup, be different than dry)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(cup, be different than dry)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(item, fall through water easier than oil)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(cup, be different than dry)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(container, is different colours)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.14
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(cup, be different than dry)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(item, have more expensive than in 1933 today)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.43
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(cup, be different than dry)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(container, is different colours)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(cup, be different than dry)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(item, fall through water easier than oil)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(cup, be different than dry)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(item, have more expensive than in 1933 today)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.53
Plausible(container, is different colours)
Evidence: 0.08
Remarkable(cup, be different than dry)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(cup, be different than dry)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(item, have more expensive than in 1933 today)
Evidence: 0.08
Remarkable(cup, be different than dry)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(cup, be different than dry)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(item, fall through water easier than oil)
Evidence: 0.08
Remarkable(cup, be different than dry)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(cup, be different than dry)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(cup, be different than dry)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Salient(cup, be different than dry)

Similarity expansion

0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.08
Remarkable(cup, be different than dry)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(cup, smell like wet dog)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(cup, be different than dry)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Plausible(cup, smell like wet dog)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.07
Salient(cup, be different than dry)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Salient(cup, smell like wet dog)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.25
Typical(cup, be different than dry)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(cup, smell like wet dog)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.07
Salient(cup, be different than dry)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(cup, be different than dry)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(cup, be different than dry)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.06
Plausible(cup, be different than dry)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(cup, be different than dry)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(cup, be different than dry)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(container, is different colours)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(cup, be different than dry)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(item, fall through water easier than oil)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(cup, be different than dry)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(item, have more expensive than in 1933 today)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.23
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.25
Typical(cup, be different than dry)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(container, is different colours)
0.18
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.25
Typical(cup, be different than dry)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(item, fall through water easier than oil)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.25
Typical(cup, be different than dry)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(item, have more expensive than in 1933 today)