cup: be in estonia

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents container
Weight: 0.69
, item
Weight: 0.61
, kitchen utensil
Weight: 0.60
, bowl
Weight: 0.59
Siblings coffee cup
Weight: 0.73
, ramekin
Weight: 0.37
, jug
Weight: 0.35
, coffee mug
Weight: 0.35
, wooden spoon
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be in estonia 1.00
be in pasadena 1.00
be on csgolounge 0.81
be in hcr2 work 0.78
is last place 0.78
have winrate 0.77
be are really used 0.75
be are used 0.75
was by water important 0.75
have more expensive than in 1933 today 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(item, have more expensive than in 1933 today)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(cup, be in estonia)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(container, be are really used)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(cup, be in estonia)
0.16
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(container, be are used)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(cup, be in estonia)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.20
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(bowl, be in pasadena)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(cup, be in estonia)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(cup, be in estonia)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Plausible(bowl, be in pasadena)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(cup, be in estonia)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(container, be are used)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(cup, be in estonia)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(container, be are really used)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(cup, be in estonia)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(item, have more expensive than in 1933 today)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.56
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(cup, be in estonia)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(bowl, be in pasadena)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(cup, be in estonia)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(container, be are really used)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(cup, be in estonia)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(item, have more expensive than in 1933 today)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(cup, be in estonia)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(container, be are used)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(cup, be in estonia)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(wooden spoon, is last place)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(cup, be in estonia)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(jug, have winrate)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(item, have more expensive than in 1933 today)
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(cup, be in estonia)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(cup, be in estonia)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(bowl, be in pasadena)
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(cup, be in estonia)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(cup, be in estonia)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.58
Plausible(container, be are really used)
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(cup, be in estonia)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(cup, be in estonia)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(container, be are used)
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(cup, be in estonia)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(cup, be in estonia)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(cup, be in estonia)
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(jug, have winrate)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(jug, have winrate)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(cup, be in estonia)
Evidence: 0.42
Remarkable(wooden spoon, is last place)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(wooden spoon, is last place)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(cup, be in estonia)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(cup, be in estonia)

Similarity expansion

0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(cup, be in estonia)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Salient(cup, be in hcr2 work)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(cup, be in estonia)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(cup, be in hcr2 work)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(cup, be in estonia)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(cup, be in hcr2 work)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(cup, be in estonia)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(cup, be in hcr2 work)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(cup, be in estonia)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(cup, be in estonia)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(cup, be in estonia)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
Plausible(cup, be in estonia)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(cup, be in estonia)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.45
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(cup, be in estonia)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(bowl, be in pasadena)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(cup, be in estonia)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(container, be are used)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(cup, be in estonia)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(container, be are really used)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(cup, be in estonia)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(item, have more expensive than in 1933 today)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(cup, be in estonia)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(jug, have winrate)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(cup, be in estonia)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(wooden spoon, is last place)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(cup, be in estonia)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(bowl, be in pasadena)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(cup, be in estonia)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(container, be are used)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(cup, be in estonia)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(container, be are really used)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(cup, be in estonia)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(item, have more expensive than in 1933 today)