curling: be in canada

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents sport
Weight: 0.66
, game
Weight: 0.61
, thing
Weight: 0.60
, event
Weight: 0.56
, topic
Weight: 0.52
Siblings hockey game
Weight: 0.35
, ice hockey
Weight: 0.35
, cross country skiing
Weight: 0.35
, soccer ball
Weight: 0.35
, hockey stick
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be in canada 1.00
be popular in canada 0.96

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(curling, be in canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(ice hockey, be popular in canada)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(curling, be in canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
Remarkable(ice hockey, be popular in canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(ice hockey, be popular in canada)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(curling, be in canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Salient(curling, be in canada)

Similarity expansion

0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.43
Remarkable(curling, be in canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(curling, be popular in canada)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.41
Typical(curling, be in canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(curling, be popular in canada)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(curling, be in canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(curling, be popular in canada)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.33
Salient(curling, be in canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(curling, be popular in canada)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.33
Salient(curling, be in canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(curling, be in canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(curling, be in canada)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(curling, be in canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(curling, be in canada)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Remarkable(curling, be in canada) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(ice hockey, be popular in canada)