current: be controlled in welding transformer

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents variable
Weight: 0.59
, quantity
Weight: 0.56
, topic
Weight: 0.54
, factor
Weight: 0.50
Siblings ampere
Weight: 0.47
, management
Weight: 0.31
, duration
Weight: 0.31
, interest rate
Weight: 0.31
, cost
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
be controlled in welding transformer 1.00
is generator 0.77
be in dc generator 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(topic, is generator)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(current, be controlled in welding transformer)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(current, be controlled in welding transformer)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(topic, is generator)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(current, be controlled in welding transformer)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(topic, is generator)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(topic, is generator)
Evidence: 0.20
Remarkable(current, be controlled in welding transformer)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(current, be controlled in welding transformer)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(current, be controlled in welding transformer)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Salient(current, be controlled in welding transformer)

Similarity expansion

0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.60
Typical(current, be controlled in welding transformer)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(current, be in dc generator)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(current, be controlled in welding transformer)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(current, be in dc generator)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.25
Salient(current, be controlled in welding transformer)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Salient(current, be in dc generator)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.20
Remarkable(current, be controlled in welding transformer)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(current, be in dc generator)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.25
Salient(current, be controlled in welding transformer)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(current, be controlled in welding transformer)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(current, be controlled in welding transformer)

Typical implies Plausible

0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(current, be controlled in welding transformer)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(current, be controlled in welding transformer)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.34
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Remarkable(current, be controlled in welding transformer)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(topic, is generator)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.27
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.60
Typical(current, be controlled in welding transformer)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(topic, is generator)