current: be lost in circuit

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents variable
Weight: 0.59
, quantity
Weight: 0.56
, topic
Weight: 0.54
, factor
Weight: 0.50
Siblings ampere
Weight: 0.47
, management
Weight: 0.31
, duration
Weight: 0.31
, interest rate
Weight: 0.31
, cost
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
be lost in circuit 1.00
be in circuit 0.90
be circuit 0.89
be important in circuit 0.89
be different in circuit 0.89
be circuit different 0.88
be related in circuit 0.88
be same in series circuit 0.86
be in series circuit 0.86
add up in circuit 0.85

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(current, be lost in circuit)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Salient(current, be lost in circuit)

Similarity expansion

0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.69
Typical(current, be lost in circuit)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(current, be in circuit)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(current, be lost in circuit)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(current, be in circuit)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.34
Salient(current, be lost in circuit)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Salient(current, be in circuit)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.69
Typical(current, be lost in circuit)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(current, be same in series circuit)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.69
Typical(current, be lost in circuit)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(current, be in series circuit)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.69
Typical(current, be lost in circuit)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(current, be related in circuit)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(current, be lost in circuit)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Remarkable(current, be in series circuit)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.34
Salient(current, be lost in circuit)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Salient(current, be in series circuit)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.69
Typical(current, be lost in circuit)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(current, be important in circuit)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(current, be lost in circuit)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(current, be in series circuit)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(current, be lost in circuit)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(current, be same in series circuit)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(current, be lost in circuit)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(current, be in circuit)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(current, be lost in circuit)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(current, be same in series circuit)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.34
Salient(current, be lost in circuit)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Salient(current, be same in series circuit)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(current, be lost in circuit)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(current, be related in circuit)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(current, be lost in circuit)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(current, be important in circuit)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(current, be lost in circuit)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(current, be important in circuit)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(current, be lost in circuit)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(current, be related in circuit)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.34
Salient(current, be lost in circuit)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(current, be related in circuit)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.34
Salient(current, be lost in circuit)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(current, be important in circuit)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.34
Salient(current, be lost in circuit)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(current, be lost in circuit)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(current, be lost in circuit)

Typical implies Plausible

0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
Plausible(current, be lost in circuit)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(current, be lost in circuit)