custard: has quality good

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents dessert
Weight: 0.76
, dish
Weight: 0.71
, flavor
Weight: 0.64
, sweet
Weight: 0.60
, ice cream
Weight: 0.55
Siblings flan
Weight: 0.63
, lemon curd
Weight: 0.61
, tiramisu
Weight: 0.40
, chocolate cake
Weight: 0.40
, frozen custard
Weight: 0.39

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality good 1.00
has quality bad 0.96
has quality better 0.94
is good for 0.86
has shape solid 0.79
taste good 0.79
has quality spot 0.79
be bad for health 0.77
is best 0.76
go to solid 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.62
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(ice cream, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(custard, has quality good)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(dessert, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(custard, has quality good)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(dessert, is best)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(custard, has quality good)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(dessert, taste good)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(custard, has quality good)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(sweet, has quality spot)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(custard, has quality good)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(dish, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(custard, has quality good)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(ice cream, be bad for health)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(custard, has quality good)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(sweet, taste good)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(custard, has quality good)
0.15
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(sweet, be bad for health)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(custard, has quality good)
0.14
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.22
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(dessert, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(custard, has quality good)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.17
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(flavor, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(custard, has quality good)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.17
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(ice cream, go to solid)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(custard, has quality good)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(custard, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(flavor, has quality bad)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(custard, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(dessert, has quality bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(custard, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(dish, has quality bad)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(custard, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(dessert, has quality good)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(custard, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(ice cream, has quality good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(custard, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(ice cream, go to solid)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(custard, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(sweet, taste good)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(custard, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(sweet, be bad for health)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(custard, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(ice cream, be bad for health)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(custard, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(sweet, has quality spot)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(custard, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(dessert, taste good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(custard, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(dessert, is best)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.54
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(custard, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(flavor, has quality bad)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(custard, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(dessert, has quality bad)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(custard, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(dish, has quality bad)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(custard, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(sweet, be bad for health)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(custard, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(ice cream, go to solid)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(custard, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(ice cream, be bad for health)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(custard, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(ice cream, has quality good)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(custard, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(dessert, has quality good)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(custard, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(dessert, is best)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(custard, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(sweet, has quality spot)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(custard, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(dessert, taste good)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(custard, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(sweet, taste good)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(custard, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(tiramisu, has quality bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(custard, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Remarkable(tiramisu, is good for)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(custard, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(tiramisu, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(custard, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(tiramisu, has quality better)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(custard, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(chocolate cake, has quality good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(custard, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(flan, has quality good)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(ice cream, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(custard, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(custard, has quality good)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(dessert, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(custard, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(custard, has quality good)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(dish, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(custard, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(custard, has quality good)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.09
Plausible(dessert, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(custard, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(custard, has quality good)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(flavor, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(custard, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(custard, has quality good)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(dessert, is best)
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(custard, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(custard, has quality good)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(dessert, taste good)
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(custard, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(custard, has quality good)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(sweet, has quality spot)
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(custard, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(custard, has quality good)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(sweet, taste good)
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(custard, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(custard, has quality good)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(ice cream, be bad for health)
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(custard, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(custard, has quality good)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(sweet, be bad for health)
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(custard, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(custard, has quality good)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(ice cream, go to solid)
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(custard, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(custard, has quality good)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(custard, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(flan, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(flan, has quality good)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(custard, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(chocolate cake, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Plausible(chocolate cake, has quality good)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(custard, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.68
Remarkable(tiramisu, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(tiramisu, has quality good)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(custard, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(tiramisu, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(tiramisu, has quality better)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(custard, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.38
Remarkable(tiramisu, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(tiramisu, has quality bad)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(custard, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.48
Remarkable(tiramisu, is good for)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(tiramisu, is good for)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(custard, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Salient(custard, has quality good)

Similarity expansion

0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(custard, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Salient(custard, has shape solid)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(custard, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(custard, has shape solid)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.75
Remarkable(custard, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(custard, has shape solid)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(custard, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(custard, has shape solid)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.95
Salient(custard, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(custard, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(custard, has quality good)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Plausible(custard, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(custard, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.41
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(custard, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(flavor, has quality bad)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(custard, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(sweet, taste good)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(custard, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(dessert, has quality bad)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(custard, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(ice cream, go to solid)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(custard, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(dish, has quality bad)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(custard, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(ice cream, be bad for health)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(custard, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(dessert, has quality good)
0.21
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(custard, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(sweet, has quality spot)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(custard, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(dessert, taste good)
0.15
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(custard, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(ice cream, has quality good)
0.15
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(custard, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(sweet, be bad for health)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(custard, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(dessert, is best)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(custard, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(flan, has quality good)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(custard, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(chocolate cake, has quality good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(custard, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(tiramisu, has quality bad)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(custard, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(tiramisu, has quality better)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(custard, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(tiramisu, has quality good)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(custard, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(tiramisu, is good for)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(custard, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(flavor, has quality bad)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(custard, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(dessert, has quality bad)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(custard, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(dessert, has quality good)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(custard, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Typical(dish, has quality bad)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(custard, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(ice cream, has quality good)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(custard, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(sweet, taste good)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(custard, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(ice cream, go to solid)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(custard, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(sweet, has quality spot)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(custard, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(dessert, taste good)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(custard, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(ice cream, be bad for health)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(custard, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(sweet, be bad for health)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(custard, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(dessert, is best)