customer: has quality service

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents computer user
Weight: 0.65
, fan
Weight: 0.64
, constituent
Weight: 0.63
, business people
Weight: 0.62
Siblings employer
Weight: 0.63
, staff
Weight: 0.62
, intel
Weight: 0.60
, asset
Weight: 0.59
, john deere
Weight: 0.58

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality service 1.00
call customer service 0.84
switch service providers 0.80
importance of is service 0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(customer, has quality service)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(intel, has quality service)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.57
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(customer, has quality service)
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(intel, has quality service)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(intel, has quality service)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(customer, has quality service)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(customer, has quality service)

Similarity expansion

0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(customer, has quality service)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Salient(customer, call customer service)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(customer, has quality service)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Salient(customer, switch service providers)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(customer, has quality service)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Plausible(customer, call customer service)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(customer, has quality service)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(customer, switch service providers)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(customer, has quality service)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(customer, call customer service)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(customer, has quality service)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(customer, switch service providers)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(customer, has quality service)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(customer, call customer service)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(customer, has quality service)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(customer, switch service providers)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.76
Typical(customer, has quality service)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(customer, importance of is service)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(customer, has quality service)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Salient(customer, importance of is service)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(customer, has quality service)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Plausible(customer, importance of is service)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(customer, has quality service)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(customer, importance of is service)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Salient(customer, has quality service)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(customer, has quality service)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(customer, has quality service)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(customer, has quality service)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(customer, has quality service)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(customer, has quality service)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Typical(intel, has quality service)