customer: return

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents computer user
Weight: 0.65
, fan
Weight: 0.64
, constituent
Weight: 0.63
, business people
Weight: 0.62
Siblings employer
Weight: 0.63
, staff
Weight: 0.62
, intel
Weight: 0.60
, asset
Weight: 0.59
, john deere
Weight: 0.58

Related properties

Property Similarity
return 1.00
return good to company 0.87
return products 0.84
return to restaurants 0.81
leave 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(customer, return)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Salient(customer, return)

Similarity expansion

0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(customer, return)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(customer, return to restaurants)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(customer, return)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Plausible(customer, leave)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.20
Salient(customer, return)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Salient(customer, leave)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(customer, return)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(customer, leave)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.20
Salient(customer, return)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Salient(customer, return to restaurants)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(customer, return)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(customer, return good to company)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.44
Typical(customer, return)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(customer, leave)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.20
Salient(customer, return)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Salient(customer, return good to company)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.44
Typical(customer, return)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(customer, return to restaurants)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.44
Typical(customer, return)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(customer, return products)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.20
Salient(customer, return)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Salient(customer, return products)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(customer, return)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(customer, return good to company)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.44
Typical(customer, return)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(customer, return good to company)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(customer, return)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Remarkable(customer, return products)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(customer, return)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(customer, return products)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(customer, return)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(customer, return to restaurants)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.20
Salient(customer, return)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(customer, return)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(customer, return)

Typical implies Plausible

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(customer, return)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(customer, return)