customer: think as company

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents computer user
Weight: 0.65
, fan
Weight: 0.64
, constituent
Weight: 0.63
, business people
Weight: 0.62
Siblings employer
Weight: 0.63
, staff
Weight: 0.62
, intel
Weight: 0.60
, asset
Weight: 0.59
, john deere
Weight: 0.58

Related properties

Property Similarity
think as company 1.00
doing business with company 0.87
leave company 0.80
return good to company 0.79
be important to business 0.78
say just looking 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(customer, think as company) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(employer, be important to business)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(customer, think as company) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(employer, be important to business) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(employer, be important to business)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(customer, think as company) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Salient(customer, think as company)

Similarity expansion

0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(customer, think as company) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(customer, doing business with company)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(customer, think as company) ⋁
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Remarkable(customer, leave company)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.61
Salient(customer, think as company) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Salient(customer, leave company)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(customer, think as company) ⋁
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(customer, leave company)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(customer, think as company) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(customer, return good to company)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.40
Typical(customer, think as company) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(customer, leave company)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(customer, think as company) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(customer, say just looking)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.61
Salient(customer, think as company) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Salient(customer, return good to company)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.61
Salient(customer, think as company) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Salient(customer, doing business with company)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(customer, think as company) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(customer, be important to business)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(customer, think as company) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(customer, return good to company)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(customer, think as company) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(customer, doing business with company)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.61
Salient(customer, think as company) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Salient(customer, say just looking)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.61
Salient(customer, think as company) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(customer, be important to business)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.40
Typical(customer, think as company) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(customer, return good to company)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(customer, think as company) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(customer, be important to business)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(customer, think as company) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(customer, say just looking)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.40
Typical(customer, think as company) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Typical(customer, doing business with company)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.40
Typical(customer, think as company) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(customer, be important to business)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.40
Typical(customer, think as company) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(customer, say just looking)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
Salient(customer, think as company) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(customer, think as company) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(customer, think as company)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(customer, think as company) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(customer, think as company)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(customer, think as company) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(employer, be important to business)