cut: be cooked in hot liquid

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents action
Weight: 0.59
, change
Weight: 0.58
, emergency
Weight: 0.57
, feature
Weight: 0.56
Siblings chuck
Weight: 0.67
, loin
Weight: 0.62
, tenderloin
Weight: 0.54
, chop
Weight: 0.49
, flank
Weight: 0.47

Related properties

Property Similarity
be cooked in hot liquid 1.00
exposed to things like hot sauce 0.86
is hot 0.82
get hot 0.81
feel hot 0.79
be used in stew 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(cut, be cooked in hot liquid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(tenderloin, is hot)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.33
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(cut, be cooked in hot liquid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(tenderloin, is hot) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(tenderloin, is hot)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(cut, be cooked in hot liquid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Salient(cut, be cooked in hot liquid)

Similarity expansion

0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.44
Typical(cut, be cooked in hot liquid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(cut, exposed to things like hot sauce)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.28
Remarkable(cut, be cooked in hot liquid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(cut, be used in stew)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.25
Salient(cut, be cooked in hot liquid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Salient(cut, be used in stew)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(cut, be cooked in hot liquid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(cut, exposed to things like hot sauce)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.25
Salient(cut, be cooked in hot liquid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Salient(cut, exposed to things like hot sauce)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(cut, be cooked in hot liquid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(cut, be used in stew)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.28
Remarkable(cut, be cooked in hot liquid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(cut, feel hot)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.44
Typical(cut, be cooked in hot liquid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(cut, be used in stew)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.28
Remarkable(cut, be cooked in hot liquid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(cut, get hot)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.28
Remarkable(cut, be cooked in hot liquid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(cut, is hot)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.28
Remarkable(cut, be cooked in hot liquid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(cut, exposed to things like hot sauce)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.44
Typical(cut, be cooked in hot liquid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(cut, feel hot)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.44
Typical(cut, be cooked in hot liquid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(cut, get hot)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.44
Typical(cut, be cooked in hot liquid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(cut, is hot)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(cut, be cooked in hot liquid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(cut, feel hot)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(cut, be cooked in hot liquid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(cut, get hot)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.25
Salient(cut, be cooked in hot liquid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(cut, feel hot)
0.24
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(cut, be cooked in hot liquid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(cut, is hot)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.25
Salient(cut, be cooked in hot liquid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(cut, get hot)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.27
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.25
Salient(cut, be cooked in hot liquid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(cut, is hot)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.25
Salient(cut, be cooked in hot liquid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(cut, be cooked in hot liquid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(cut, be cooked in hot liquid)

Typical implies Plausible

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.28
Plausible(cut, be cooked in hot liquid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(cut, be cooked in hot liquid)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(cut, be cooked in hot liquid) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(tenderloin, is hot)