cut: exposed to things like hot sauce

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents action
Weight: 0.59
, change
Weight: 0.58
, emergency
Weight: 0.57
, feature
Weight: 0.56
Siblings chuck
Weight: 0.67
, loin
Weight: 0.62
, tenderloin
Weight: 0.54
, chop
Weight: 0.49
, flank
Weight: 0.47

Related properties

Property Similarity
exposed to things like hot sauce 1.00
be cooked in hot liquid 0.86
feel hot 0.82
get hot 0.81
is hot 0.80
be used in stew 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(cut, exposed to things like hot sauce)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(tenderloin, is hot)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.36
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(cut, exposed to things like hot sauce)
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(tenderloin, is hot)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(tenderloin, is hot)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(cut, exposed to things like hot sauce)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Salient(cut, exposed to things like hot sauce)

Similarity expansion

0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(cut, exposed to things like hot sauce)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(cut, be cooked in hot liquid)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.53
Salient(cut, exposed to things like hot sauce)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Salient(cut, be cooked in hot liquid)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(cut, exposed to things like hot sauce)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(cut, be cooked in hot liquid)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(cut, exposed to things like hot sauce)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(cut, be used in stew)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(cut, exposed to things like hot sauce)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(cut, feel hot)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.53
Salient(cut, exposed to things like hot sauce)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Salient(cut, be used in stew)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.47
Typical(cut, exposed to things like hot sauce)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(cut, be cooked in hot liquid)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(cut, exposed to things like hot sauce)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(cut, get hot)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(cut, exposed to things like hot sauce)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(cut, is hot)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(cut, exposed to things like hot sauce)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(cut, be used in stew)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.47
Typical(cut, exposed to things like hot sauce)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(cut, be used in stew)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.53
Salient(cut, exposed to things like hot sauce)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(cut, feel hot)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(cut, exposed to things like hot sauce)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(cut, feel hot)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.53
Salient(cut, exposed to things like hot sauce)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(cut, get hot)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(cut, exposed to things like hot sauce)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(cut, get hot)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.47
Typical(cut, exposed to things like hot sauce)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(cut, feel hot)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.53
Salient(cut, exposed to things like hot sauce)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(cut, is hot)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.47
Typical(cut, exposed to things like hot sauce)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(cut, get hot)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(cut, exposed to things like hot sauce)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(cut, is hot)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.47
Typical(cut, exposed to things like hot sauce)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(cut, is hot)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
Salient(cut, exposed to things like hot sauce)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(cut, exposed to things like hot sauce)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(cut, exposed to things like hot sauce)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.47
Plausible(cut, exposed to things like hot sauce)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(cut, exposed to things like hot sauce)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(cut, exposed to things like hot sauce)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(tenderloin, is hot)