cut: feel hot

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents action
Weight: 0.59
, change
Weight: 0.58
, emergency
Weight: 0.57
, feature
Weight: 0.56
Siblings chuck
Weight: 0.67
, loin
Weight: 0.62
, tenderloin
Weight: 0.54
, chop
Weight: 0.49
, flank
Weight: 0.47

Related properties

Property Similarity
feel hot 1.00
get hot 0.92
is hot 0.92
feel warm 0.83
exposed to things like hot sauce 0.82
be cooked in hot liquid 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(cut, feel hot) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Remarkable(tenderloin, is hot)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(cut, feel hot) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
Remarkable(tenderloin, is hot) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(tenderloin, is hot)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(cut, feel hot) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Salient(cut, feel hot)

Similarity expansion

0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(cut, feel hot) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(cut, get hot)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(cut, feel hot) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(cut, is hot)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(cut, feel hot) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(cut, get hot)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(cut, feel hot) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(cut, exposed to things like hot sauce)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(cut, feel hot) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(cut, get hot)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(cut, feel hot) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(cut, is hot)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(cut, feel hot) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Salient(cut, be cooked in hot liquid)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(cut, feel hot) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(cut, be cooked in hot liquid)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(cut, feel hot) ⋁
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(cut, be cooked in hot liquid)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(cut, feel hot) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(cut, is hot)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(cut, feel hot) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Salient(cut, exposed to things like hot sauce)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(cut, feel hot) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(cut, exposed to things like hot sauce)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.87
Typical(cut, feel hot) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(cut, feel warm)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(cut, feel hot) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(cut, feel warm)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(cut, feel hot) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(cut, be cooked in hot liquid)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(cut, feel hot) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(cut, feel warm)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(cut, feel hot) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(cut, get hot)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(cut, feel hot) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(cut, is hot)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(cut, feel hot) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Remarkable(cut, feel warm)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(cut, feel hot) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(cut, exposed to things like hot sauce)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.82
Salient(cut, feel hot) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(cut, feel hot) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(cut, feel hot)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.79
Plausible(cut, feel hot) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(cut, feel hot)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(cut, feel hot) ⋁
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(tenderloin, is hot)